Eli Velasquez, Director of Venture Development at VentureWell, has many years of experience developing entrepreneurial support programming for early-stage innovators. He offers insights on how to develop pitch competitions that provide maximum support to startups.
A boxing match. An ice water plunge. These are themes of two recent startup pitch competitions. Sound exciting? Sure. Does it benefit startups and the broader innovation ecosystem? That’s debatable.
The goal of pitch competitions has shifted – and not always for the better. These events, also known as Demo Days, initially centered on cultivating solid investment opportunities for startups, bringing in active investors aligned with specific sectors. Some early competitions resulted in successful deals for both entrepreneurs and investors, and generated buzz for the organizing institution. Witnessing this success, more accelerators and universities added pitch competitions to their repertoire – yet focused on the glitz of the “competition”, placing the organizers in the spotlight.
In my opinion, this trend negatively impacts startup ecosystems on several levels. Startups don’t always pitch to judges with a vested interest in making a deal, or with deep knowledge of a particular sector; a wasted opportunity for both innovator and investor. The hype of pitch competitions often elevates business valuations to levels that make it unattractive to potential investors. For universities and accelerators, the rising costs of producing pitch competitions reduces the resources available for programs that actually prepare startups for success. Worst of all, many innovators view pitch competitions as the pivotal moment in their journey. That’s misleading, as pitch competitions are one small experience in a much longer, complex journey – regardless if they win or not.
With years of experience as a Director of Venture Development – first at Texas Tech and now at VentureWell – I’ve developed programming for pitch competitions to support startups, university and accelerator partners, regional investors, and broader ecosystems. In my experience, here are four core elements of pitch competitions that create lasting impact.
Diversify the Judging Panel
Startups will likely pitch to diverse groups throughout their journey. That’s why I convene judges representing a variety of segments:
- funders seeking a well-aligned investment opportunity
- potential business partners looking for a startup to help them solve a problem
- possible customers of the product or service
- technical leads who can question and support the science
The multi-audience pitch model teaches teams to strategically explain their company’s value proposition to a mix of critical players they’ll encounter throughout their startup process.
Allocate Prizes Wisely
Don’t get me wrong, cash prizes are valuable for startups. Yet early-stage innovators also need training and mentorship in countless areas. I align awards with key milestones for the startups, creating criteria for how the money and resources will be deployed. For instance, if a team needs to conduct additional testing, pay several months worth of rent at a lab.
Designing awards to offer multiple facets of support is also worth more than a blank check in the long run – for both the innovators and the award provider. Startups receive guidance on the best way to use the funds. From the funder’s perspective, they know the money is well-managed and properly allocated.
Provide Value for Everyone Involved
Judges, mentors, investors, and other critical players in pitch competitions have little time to spare. I make sure the event is worth their while. I often build in pre-competition networking events just for key players involved with the event – and in the ecosystem. This allows the group to engage with different people who don’t always have the opportunity to connect. The attendees feel like they receive a value-add for their time commitment to the competition.
I also use pitch competitions as a learning opportunity. For example, at a Texas Tech event, I invited entrepreneurs who secured funding by appearing on Shark Tank to share their “behind the scenes” experience. Their talk opened peoples’ eyes around the reality of launching a business and partnering with investors.
Create a “Now What?” Plan
Far too many startups leave a pitch competition thinking, “Now what?”. That question has more urgency among teams who didn’t win a prize. I help teams develop a post pitch competition action plan.
This includes coaching startups to put asks in their pitch that go beyond money. Why? Because there is always someone in the room who can provide something of value such as mentorships or connections after the event. I also ask teams to provide regular progress reports that I share with the ecosystem. More often than not, the success story sparks interest from a potential business partner or investor, even if the team doesn’t make it to the podium.
Skip the Glitz
If you’re in the throes of planning pitch competitions, keep it simple. Focus your efforts on supporting the innovators, and providing value to the judges, mentors, investors, and broader ecosystem. And don’t forget: pitch competitions aren’t the final step in a startup’s journey. These events can be the start of something impactful for everyone involved.
Eli Velasquez oversees the development of our new and ongoing early-stage innovator programs, and leads investor network development. Previous to VentureWell, his efforts in Texas led to the founding of a new angel network, and over $20M in funding for startups, entrepreneurship programs, and proof of concept funds. He obtained a BS in Mechanical Engineering from Boston University and a JD degree with an Intellectual Property Certificate from Whittier Law School.